Filter By Post Type

Insights_cat
Filter by topic
Insights_tag

FAQ

Carbon credits represent a quantifiable reduction or removal of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with 1 carbon credit equaling 1 metric ton of CO₂ reduced or removed. These credits are issued when projects, such as reforestation or renewable energy initiatives, successfully mitigate emissions. Businesses and individuals can purchase these credits to offset their carbon footprints and meet sustainability goals.
Yes, carbon credits are traded internationally because climate change is a global challenge. GHGs disperse worldwide, so emission reductions made in one country benefit the entire planet. Cross-border trading allows regions with lower-cost carbon reduction projects, such as reforestation or natural carbon sinks, to supply credits to regions where reductions are more expensive. Carbon credits are also considered an emerging investment opportunity, particularly in voluntary markets, where investors fund projects to generate carbon credits and earn returns through their sale.

Carbon credit systems differ because each country designs its own emission reduction framework based on economic priorities, policies, and carbon reduction targets. For example:

● The European Union operates the EU Emissions Trading System (EU-ETS), a compliance-based cap-and-trade program.
● In the United States, some states, like California, have their own regional cap-and-trade markets.
● In Asia, countries like China and South Korea have launched pilot carbon markets to meet national goals.

While these systems are independent, many projects align with international standards such as VERRA or Gold Standard for consistency and verification.

The two markets serve different purposes:

● Compliance Carbon Markets: Created by governments or regulatory bodies to enforce emission reduction targets. Companies exceeding their caps must purchase carbon credits. Examples include the EU-ETS and California’s cap-and-trade system.
● Voluntary Carbon Markets (VCM): Companies, organizations, or individuals voluntarily purchase carbon credits to meet sustainability or net-zero targets. These markets are driven by corporate social responsibility, investor pressure, and public demand for climate action.
Both markets complement each other, driving climate action across mandatory and voluntary sectors.

The voluntary carbon market enables businesses and individuals to purchase carbon credits outside of regulatory obligations.

● Key Features:
○ Projects focus on emission reduction (e.g., renewable energy) or removal (e.g., reforestation).
○ Credits are verified by independent third-party standards, such as VERRA or Gold Standard.
○ Many projects offer co-benefits, including biodiversity conservation, community development, and ecosystem restoration.

● Pricing Characteristics:
Carbon credit prices in the voluntary market are influenced by:
○ Project type: Reforestation, mangrove conservation, biochar, and others.
○ Project location and verification standards.
○ Vintage: The year when the emission reduction occurred.
○ Additional co-benefits like job creation, ecosystem services, and improved community livelihoods.

Natural carbon sinks are ecosystems that naturally absorb and store CO₂ from the atmosphere. Scientific advancements have led to the development of methodologies that leverage natural processes for carbon sequestration. Common methodologies include:

● Afforestation and Reforestation: Planting trees to absorb and store carbon.
● Mangrove Conservation: Protecting mangrove forests to enhance coastal carbon storage.
● Peatland Restoration: Restoring degraded peatlands to prevent carbon release and improve soil health.

These projects are certified under international standards like VERRA, making the carbon credits available for purchase by businesses or individuals to achieve carbon neutrality.

The main differences are in their approach and project longevity:

● Natural Carbon Sinks: These projects focus on carbon sequestration through natural ecosystems, such as forests, wetlands, and soil. They follow strict sustainability guidelines, prioritize stakeholder engagement, and aim to preserve Earth’s long-term resilience. These projects often have longer durations and higher costs due to their ecological focus.
● General Carbon Reduction: This includes emission avoidance or reduction through technologies like renewable energy, energy efficiency, and industrial process improvements.

The higher price of natural carbon sink credits reflects their adherence to rigorous standards and their role in supporting long-term ecological and community benefits.